Deuteronomy 22:21 chances are they shall reveal the damsel on the door of the woman dad’s quarters
Evaluator 19:2 And his concubine played the whore against your, and went from the your unto this lady father’s house to Bethlehemjudah, and got around four entire period.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these phrase toward the north, and say, Go Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith god; and I also cannot trigger mine outrage to fall upon you: for I Will Be merciful, saith the LORD, and that I will not keep outrage for everaˆ¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith god, return unto me: of course thou wilt store thine abominations of my personal sight, after that shalt thou not removeaˆ¦
Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith god
They say. –Better, So to speak, as introducing another applying of the figure. The direct guide is Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the come back to yesteryear partner as an abomination, a rules that recent breakthrough for the guide associated with the rules (2Kings 22:10-11) have probably lead into prominence. But there is in addition a clear allusion into like images in Hosea. There the prophet had accomplished, virtually or even in parable, just what laws had prohibited (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and got conducted out of the likelihood of return therefore the desire of pardon. Jeremiah has to play a sterner role. and improve apostate adulteress no less than believe she had sinned as well seriously to have any claims to forgiveness. It might seem just as if Jehovah cannot today go back to the love of their espousals, making the girl just what she when had been.
Yet go back once again in my opinion, saith the father. –The terms noise in the English like a gracious invitation, and–in spite on the power many interpreters who take it as an indignant exclamation, and come back to me personally! an invite provided in irony, and thus comparable to getting rejected, as if that return were from the question–it must, i do believe, getting thus taken. The prophet enjoys, once we have seen, the real history of Hosea in his mind’s eye, in which there was indeed these a call to return (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), and in actual fact identifies they and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It surely means a want of understanding of the smoothness of Jeremiah to suppose that he previously emerged before guys as announcing an irrevocable condemnation, leaving out the possibility of repentance.
Verse 1. – they state , etc.; as the margin of Authorized variation properly mentions, the Hebrew just provides “saying.” Numerous clever efforts have been made to describe this. Hitzig, such as, followed closely by Dr. Payne Smith, believes that “stating” could be a unique equivalent for “that is to say,” “including,” or even the similar; even though the Vulgate and Rashi, followed by De Wette and RosenmA?ller, believe an ellipsis, and give, “truly typically mentioned,” or “I might say.” But much probably the most all-natural method is to guess that “stating” are a fragment of this superscription regarding the prophecy, the remaining that has been unintentionally positioned in ver. 6, and therefore we ought to see, “as well as the word of the Lord arrived unto myself when you look at the times of Josiah the king, stating.” Very J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If a guy set aside his partner . The debate guyspy tips try founded about law of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite who’d divorced their partner to take the lady once more, if inside the interval she were hitched to a different. The Jews have busted a still most sacred link, perhaps not once just, but continually; they worshipped “gods numerous and lords many;” so they had no much longer any declare on Jehovah in advantage of his “covenant” together with group. Shall the guy go back , etc.? fairly, Ought the guy to come back? The power of this phrase was possible (comp. Authorized form of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought to not be done”). Shall not in the next term is pretty wouldn’t . Yet return once again in my experience. Therefore Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, in addition to see could seem to-be affirmed from the invitations in vers. 12, 14, 22. But since it is clearly inconsistent utilizing the argument associated with verse, and as the verb may equally well be the infinitive or even the vital, most recent commentators make, “And thinkest thou to come back if you ask me?” (practically, and returning to myself! implying your very tip is inconceivable). Most likely Jeremiah was aware that a number of the Jews are disappointed utilizing the spiritual state on the nation (comp. ver. 4).